Page 2 of 2
Re: Question on CRC.
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:42 pm
by Original
Ohh.Thanks.The AOB's are for GameGuard?Oh than its usless?Or just maybe the AOB's are useable for HShield?So if i'm right.I've gotta code a DLL than inject it into HShield or Maple?
Re: Question on CRC.
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:51 pm
by Boredness
Original wrote:Ohh.Thanks.The AOB's are for GameGuard?Oh than its usless?Or just maybe the AOB's are useable for HShield?So if i'm right.I've gotta code a DLL than inject it into HShield or Maple?
aob are for gg
Re: Question on CRC.
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:10 pm
by Original
Soo.Any ideas on how i can find HShield's CRC Address and JMP?
Re: Question on CRC.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:21 am
by ajerul
hmm im very nub but.. just suggesting or giving idea but.. sorry if im wrong or being annoying
kk hs recheck the hash from certain range of the memory rite? when some addresses' value been change the crc's value will be change rite? so.. using hack will change the crc value rite? so, can we (or me maybe) suspend the process and search for the crc address?
owh about the memory range, is it possible the hs re locate them like from address 1<<(example lol) to 10 and 12 to 15 by skipping address 11 unused by the program?
i think i'm gonna get myself whack cause of this post zzzz
Re: Question on CRC.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:57 pm
by Original
Yeah.HS recheck's the CRC/Fingerprint of the memory or w/e.So by loading a false memory which is clean and than forcing it to scan there than.We can say successfully bypassed it?And yes if you change the address.The CRC changes so it doesnt match the original harsh or w/e than they DC you.
About the memory range thing.I think i read it up before.But they say its gonna be very tedious.And why not just use the above method?
Oh they added that if your gonna do this method.Why not just emulate HS and problem solved.
Re: Question on CRC.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:25 pm
by Boredness
Original wrote:Yeah.HS recheck's the CRC/Fingerprint of the memory or w/e.So by loading a false memory which is clean and than forcing it to scan there than.We can say successfully bypassed it?And yes if you change the address.The CRC changes so it doesnt match the original harsh or w/e than they DC you.
About the memory range thing.I think i read it up before.But they say its gonna be very tedious.And why not just use the above method?
Oh they added that if your gonna do this method.Why not just emulate HS and problem solved.
GMS already did it.
HSless Client.
nop the checks.
Re: Question on CRC.
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:38 pm
by Original
Alright.Thanks but ANY IDEAS ON HOW I CAN FIND THE ADDRESS?